【物理-事理-人理系统方法论（WSR）专辑】WSR方法论与可拓学的对比分析及事理知识图谱模型研究

WSR方法论与可拓学的对比分析及事理知识图谱模型研究

Research on Knowledge Graph Model of Shili Based on Comparative Analysis of WSR Methodology and Extenics

• 李兴森,广东工业大学可拓学与创新方法研究所教授,博士

• 陆琳,广西师范大学经济管理学院教授,博士

• 许立波,浙大宁波理工学院计算机与数据工程学院讲师,博士

 随着网络信息环境下复杂问题处理需求的扩大，物理-事理-人理方法论（WSR）的研究与应用越发得到重视。但物理、事理、人理三个基本概念尚未完全实现模型化、形式化表达，在一定程度上限制了其更广泛的应用。将WSR与可拓学两大中国学者创立的与系统工程相关的方法论进行对比分析，分别对比界定了WSR中的物理、事理、人理与可拓学基元理论的物元、事元和关系元等概念的内涵和外延，论证了它们之间的异同点和交叉互补性。在此基础上提出了WSR方法论中物理、事理、人理用可拓学基元表达的方法，最后阐述了大数据环境下研究构建事理知识图谱的必要性及其示例模型，指出了WSR与可拓学交叉研究的方向。

关键词：WSR, 可拓学, 基元理论, 系统工程, 事理知识图谱

国家自然科学基金面上项目（72071049）

教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目（18YJAZH049）

With the increasing demand of complex problem processing in the network information environment, the research and application of the Wuli-Shili-Renli methodology (WSR) has been paid more attention. However, the three basic concepts of Wuli-Shili-Renli have not been fully modeled and formally expressed, which limits their wider application to a certain extent. This paper makes a comparative analysis of WSR and Extenics, which are both established by Chinese scholars and related to system methodology. The intention and extension of the three basic concepts of Wuli, Shili and Renli are compared and defined with matter element, affair element and relation element of basic element theory in Extenics. Then the differences and cross complementarity between them is demonstrated. On this basis, we put forward the basic element expression method of Wuli, Shili and Renli in WSR. Finally, we present the necessity of constructing the Shili knowledge graph in the big data environment and give a Shili model for example, and propose the future cross-research direction of WSR and Extenics.

Key words：WSR, Extenics, basic element theory, system engineering, knowledge graph of Shili

复制以下链接至浏览器中下载，或直接点击“阅读原文”即可下载全文!

点击下载:

http://journal05.magtech.org.cn/jweb_glpl/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=2016